I recently participated in a comprehensive interview with EY, where I engaged with a cordial and approachable interviewer. The discussion primarily focused on foundational machine learning concepts, assessing my understanding of key principles and algorithms. Additionally, I demonstrated my programming skills through a live coding exercise in an online editor, showcasing my ability to implement machine learning solutions in Python. The overall experience was productive and enlightening, providing valuable insight into EY's evaluation process.
Two rounds of interview. First with Senior Manager or Director. Final with Partner. First mostly technical, second more relaxed, seeing fit and all that. Overall chill and not that bad
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Mostl around previous experience and things in my CV
J'ai passé un entretien chez EY (Bristol, Angleterre)
Entretien
Straight forward process. Not very thorough and interviewer asked fairly basic questions. Didn't give much information about the company, clients or culture which would have been useful. Seemed fairly disinterested.
Fast two‑round processes where both interviews are directly with Directors or Partners, combined with immediate HR scheduling after an online application, usually signal a high‑priority vacancy and a shortlist that’s already been narrowed. It often means they’re moving quickly to secure strong candidates and want decision‑makers involved early to avoid delays.