The interview started with describing my previous experience and continued on discussing my stronger points. Then, online coding exercise started. Final stage covered technical questions on ML. The interviewer was well prepared and he tried to ask from the areas where I am mostly experienced with. This was a good point.

The interview process was poorly organized and unprofessional. Across 5 rounds, multiple interviewers used the exact same question, showing a clear lack of coordination. As a candidate with a PhD in Machine Learning, I was given feedback that my machine learning knowledge was insufficient — yet one of the interviewers was unfamiliar with basic ML terminology and apologized at the end of the interview for his limited English proficiency, which made technical communication nearly impossible. The overall experience suggested a significant mismatch between the stated requirements and the actual evaluation criteria, and raised serious questions about the interview process design and interviewer preparation.