Timely (Nulogy got back to me promptly at all stages in the process), professional (interviewers were knowledgable and on-time), relevant (interview questions had to do with Nulogy's actual domain; many good explanations as to what Nulogy does), and challenging (Some questions definitely had me thinking hard) without being over-the-top with questions designed to grill or trick people.

Super slow. And unresponsive. So slow that I ended up taking a role with Facebook in the process of this application because Facebook was way more organised in scheduling interviews and was actually looking for an engineer and no a comments formatter. First call was great and was handled by an actual engineer. It was helpful to jump right to the tech talk. Assignment was super easy, however it was rejected due to flood of personal and styling preferences of the reviewers. I even got a comment about using `class << self` questioning what it does and wether it's needed at all in a module. Yes it could be `extend Namespace` or it could be a `class` even. Point is it's a personal or a style matter. Candidates have no idea about your internal style-guides. Statement about the use of blocks just killed the last bits of my interest in this company. Assignment review speaks for the level of knowledge and type of environment. Funny, some failed to even bring the environment without dependencies locally. Literally all you need is: irb and a bash. I am glad the interview process is over with just an assignment and I haven't wasted more of my time. Good luck with your business guys.

HR connected in a week for the HR round and held technical test for the other week. The Technical questions were basic questions.They were actually not interested in hiring. Some reference was required to get in there.