The initial stages of the overall process was good. I was contacted by a sourcer and then a recruiter who asked me a few basic questions over the phone. Then I received a quick email saying I have been selected for an on-site interview. A few emails were exchanged and an on-site was scheduled. On the day of the interview, I was received by a coordinator and informed of the interview schedule. This is when everything started going downhill. My recruiter (who had scheduled the on-site) had called me prior to the interview saying that the interviewers may ask situational hypothetical questions not related to recruiting. I just did not realize how many of such questions will be asked. I thought I prepped really well. But almost all of the questions by 4 interviewers over 2 hours were situational, hypothetical, non-recruiting related questions - What if I have to design their new cafeteria, what if I have to design a training plan......it went on and on....There were barely 2-3 questions that they asked related to recruiting. Apparently, Google wants to understand your thought process. The interviewers kept saying there are no "wrong answers" and they want to understand how I think. I tried my best to answer their questions. It was the toughest interview I had given but I had practiced a lot. But two days later, I received an email from my recruiter saying that I will not be moving forward. He also said he would like to talk to me to discuss the "interview outcome" and how we can stay in touch for future opportunities. When he called, it was a 2 minute call to let me know that he cannot discuss the interview result due to confidentiality and that I can apply again in 6 months. This is ridiculous, if you cannot give feedback, why bother telling me that you would like to call and discuss the "interview outcome". Also, I am not sure how Google determines a person's success in a particular job by asking totally irrelevant questions. I have been a recruiter for more than 8 years and have been pretty successful in all of my jobs. After the interview itself and before even getting the results, I realized one thing - Google only employs people with the same thought process - there is no diversity of thoughts.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
All situational hypothetical non-recruiting related questions
J'ai passé un entretien chez Google (Londres, Angleterre)
Entretien
Smooth sailing. The recruiter was communicative and kept me up to date throughout. Pretty clear the teams here are packed with smart people. Googleyness interview was actually quite fun, but the GCA one was pretty tricky.
J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 4 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Google (Singapour) en mars 2026
Entretien
Structured, rigorous, and well-organized process with clear evaluation criteria. Thoughtful interviewers, strong focus on problem-solving and communication, smooth coordination, and a professional, candidate-friendly experience throughout. Really enjoyable process overall with friendly and approachable interviewers.
J'ai passé un entretien chez Google (New York, NY)
Entretien
I applied, then had a recruiter screen. After that, I went through two interviews focused on sourcing and stakeholder management, followed by a virtual onsite with four interviews. Each interviewer tested one competency. Maybe there would be more stages but I didn't pass the fourth one.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
“Walk me through how you would build a pipeline for a hard-to-fill role.”
“Tell me about a time you disagreed with a hiring manager. What did you do?”
“How do you evaluate candidate quality beyond a resume?”
“How do you prioritize when you’re managing multiple roles with competing deadlines?”
“Describe a time you had to close a candidate who was hesitant.”
“How do you use data to improve your recruiting process?”
“Tell me about a hire that didn’t work out. What did you learn?”
“Why Google, and why recruiting here specifically?”