This was one of the most positive hiring experiences I’ve had. After submitting my application, I was promptly contacted by a recruiter who stayed as my point of contact throughout the entire process. A unique aspect of this company’s approach is that candidates don’t have to wait until the application deadline; if you’re a good fit, the process begins immediately. The recruiter was both professional and approachable, providing plenty of helpful resources about the hiring stages and the company’s values (which are important to understand). The next step was an online assessment that took about an hour and could be completed from home. Most of the questions were technical, framed as though you were responding to client inquiries via email or tickets. The day after completing this, I was invited to a technical screening. Despite the name, this “phone screening” was actually conducted as a video interview. This stage was the most challenging in terms of technical knowledge, as it covered a wide range of topics and lasted about 45 minutes. That same evening, the recruiter emailed to inform me that I’d been invited to the final interview round, referred to as the "loop." During a follow-up call, the recruiter thoroughly explained the loop process and emphasized the importance of preparing examples for the company’s core values. A good rule of thumb: prepare at least two stories per value and include measurable data for each, as demonstrating data-driven decision-making is highly valued. Additionally, I was given an assignment to prepare a project presentation. The loop itself took a couple of weeks to arrange (which I was informed about in advance). It consisted of five interviews: - Two focused entirely on values and behavior-based questions. - Two combined technical knowledge with questions about values. - One interview blended the two. The interviewers were professional, supportive, and positive throughout the process, sometimes even offering guidance to help me clarify my answers. In one technical session, I was asked to design a system, while in another, I presented my prepared slides related to a specific domain. The project presentation was requested only by the hiring manager. What stood out was the company’s commitment to timelines. They provided decisions within two days after the online assessment and technical screening, and within five days after the loop interviews. However, the final decision phase did take longer than expected due to unforeseen delays. I learned that the five interviewers conduct a debrief led by a "bar raiser," who ensures consistency in the evaluation process before a final decision is made. In the end, I had a call with the recruiter, who shared mixed news. While I got "inclined", the position had been put on hold. However, the recruiter explained that my result would remain valid for a year, and I would be offered a contract if the role reopened.

Few rounds of interview, mixed with behavioral and technical questions to showcase you knowledge of building system on aws. They also asked gen ai questions on how you would create these systems