J'ai postulé via la recommandation d'un employé. Le processus a pris 2 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Amazon (Seattle, WA) en avr. 2015
Entretien
I was approached by a hiring manager who has known me and my work for several years. He is responsible for finding somebody to take an idea that Jeff Bezos personally wants developed. After several attempts at recruiting me, I agreed to interview for the role. Amazon has a very structured interview process, and to a startup guy, the pace feels glacial. Several days after submitting my resume, HR contacted me for an initial informational screen. That employee was essentially attempting to determine my compensation requirements, and to gauge my interest in the role. After our call, several emails were exchanged to schedule the first of two phone screens. After a week or so, the first phone screen interview was finally conducted.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
The call itself was strange. I asked questions about the product, who was involved in the past, the current status, who would be involved in the future, how the interviewer imagined it would evolve, the existing challenges, how much work had been done on the business case, how far technical development had progressed, etc.
The interviewer stated they had primary responsibility for the product currently, and answered my questions--but it was clear that their thoughts on both the business case, the product itself, and how he was going to allocate his existing development resources was actively evolving during the call. He was clarifying his thoughts and plans based on our conversation. It was also clear that I was merely serving as a facilitator, not really being interviewed. The interviewer was taking the opportunity to put the product roadmap and current plan through it's paces.
J'ai postulé en ligne. J'ai passé un entretien chez Amazon en juin 2026
Entretien
No HR screen; you answer those questions over email. You do a ridiculous project simulation where you answer emails. Paradoxically it’s interesting yet cheesy at the same time. Very unique but not that difficult. Then the first real interview. Rarely with the direct hiring manager; usually someone else in the org but not this direct team. So it’s useless to research the department. In fact, it’s better to prepare your strong STAR examples. They probe deep, which is fine. They heavily expect numbers. The more you can spout out random numbers (it’s okay, no one will verify) the better. The final round is more of the same — Just more STAR interviews, 2 per session, 4 sessions total. The people in this round are even more critical and harsh than the previous rounds. All done by people who have worked here for 5+ years and have never left — or if they did they came from another FANG company. So they’re all typically arrogant and jaded and negative or on the way to getting there. Finally they all have this weird verbal communication style where they just talk on and on like they expect you to interrupt them — but it’s an interview so you have to be polite can’t interrupt them. So like what the heck.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
A time you had to mediate a conflict between two stakeholders. A time you had to dig deep into the data.
It had 6 rounds- heavily focussed on leadership principles. they really do cross question almost every other example.......... You get multiple interviewers across the organisation. I thought- the questions were repetitive after one point.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Mention a time when you could give the customer what they asked for ?
J'ai postulé via un recruteur. J'ai passé un entretien chez Amazon
Entretien
1. Initial Screening: It begins with a recruiter sync.
2. The "Loop": It's a 5-to-6-round panel interview focusing on deep technical skills, system design, leadership principles, or domain expertise depending on the role.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Describe a time when you had to take a risk or make a decision with incomplete information.