Aller au contenuAller au pied de page
  • Emplois
  • Entreprises
  • Salaires
  • Pour les employeurs

      Boostez votre carrière

      Découvrez votre salaire potentiel, décrochez des emplois de rêve et partagez vos témoignages de manière anonyme.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      GitHub

      Est-ce votre entreprise ?

      À propos
      Avis
      Salaires et avantages
      Emplois
      Entretiens
      Entretiens
      Recherches associées: Avis sur GitHub | Offres d’emploi chez GitHub | Salaires chez GitHub | Avantages sociaux chez GitHub
      Entretiens chez GitHubEntretiens d’embauche pour Software Engineer chez GitHubEntretien chez GitHub


      Glassdoor

      • À propos
      • Récompenses
      • Blog
      • Nous contacter
      • Guides

      Employeurs

      • Compte employeur gratuit
      • Centre employeur
      • Blog pour les employeurs

      Informations

      • Aide
      • Règles de la communauté
      • Conditions d'utilisation
      • Confidentialité et choix publicitaires
      • Ne pas vendre ni partager mes informations
      • Outil de consentement aux cookies

      Travailler avec nous

      • Annonceurs
      • Carrières
      Télécharger l'application

      • Parcourir par :
      • Entreprises
      • Emplois
      • Lieux

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. « Glassdoor », son logo, « Worklife Pro » et « Bowls » sont des marques déposées de Glassdoor LLC.

      Entreprises suivies

      Tenez-vous au courant des dernières opportunités et profitez de conseils d’initiés en suivant les entreprises de vos rêves.

      Recherche d’emplois

      Obtenez des recommandations et des mises à jour personnalisées en démarrant vos recherches.

      Entretien pour Software Engineer

      21 août 2017
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Oakland, CA
      Aucune offre
      Expérience négative
      Entretien moyen

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé via un recruteur. Le processus a pris 2 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez GitHub (Oakland, CA) en août 2017

      Entretien

      After a video chat with the hiring manager, I scheduled a time to do an online test for GitHub. In a separate email, I was informed that the test would involve writing a simple NodeJS AddOn, and that the particular task didn't require specialized domain knowledge, beyond knowing C++. The email informed me that the code for the test was developed against a specific version of NodeJS, which was older than the available current version, and that I would be sent a link to GitHub repo, which would be accessible for a limited time. Finally, the email said there were would be a README file that contained specific instructions for setting up the development environment. On the day of the test, I received an automated email that contained a link to the GitHub repository, as promised. I cloned the repository onto my laptop. There was a README file that contained a description of the problem I was supposed to solve and the file contained information about how to run the unit tests to exercise the project that I was supposed to modify, but there were no instructions on setting up the environment to run the project. I spent a significant amount of time and effort just setting up the development environment, as I had to scour the GitHub forums to resolve my issues. I only have a passing familiarity with NodeJS and had never written a NodeJS AddOn, which I admitted readily to the hiring manager, but it was really unfair to have to struggle with development environment set-up issues in addition to having to work with a new technology on a time limited test. That stress over the development environment was completely unnecessary. On top of that, one of the unit test scripts contained an output formatting error. This bug in the test script resulted in the failure of the unit tests because the output lines it produced did not contain carriage returns, even though the output lines produced by the test from the solution logically matched the output lines of the file containing expected output. Given that the expectation that the unit tests were supposed to be a black box, it was unclear whether the bug in the test script was an intentional bug I was expected to fix. Dealing with these set up problems and debugging the unit test script issues ate up a good chunk of the time I was given to access the test repository, and although I solved the problem itself, I was not able to make a clean submission for my test. In conclusion, this test had one of the shoddiest set-ups I have ever experienced. Coding tests should be fun, and while I learned a new technology (NodeJS AddOns are cool!), the stress from the set-up problems with which I had to deal - problems that could have been solved with better instructions - did not make this test fun.

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      Write a NodeJS Addon, and make sure it passes all the provided unit tests.
      1 réponse
      13
      avatar
      Réponse de GitHub
      8y
      We really appreciate you leaving this detailed feedback and after reading it, we have made some changes to the technical exercise based on your experience with us. We are revamping the preparation email to include more detailed instructions and hope to continue to improve the quality of this exercise moving forward. Thank you again for sharing this.

      Autres retours d’entretien d’embauche pour un poste comme Software Engineer chez GitHub

      Entretien pour Software Engineer

      21 mai 2026
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Aucune offre
      Expérience négative
      Entretien moyen

      Candidature

      J'ai passé un entretien chez GitHub

      Entretien

      There were a total of four interview rounds: a recruiter screening, a hiring manager interview, and a loop consisting of system design and coding rounds. The interviews went very well, and after each round, the interviewers seemed highly impressed and mentioned that I would hear back from the recruiter soon. However, I was ultimately rejected because the decision came down to a very close comparison between me and another candidate. Additionally, the recruiter was not very helpful throughout the process, which made the experience more frustrating.

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      Behavioral questions and previous work experience
      Répondre à cette question

      Entretien pour Software Engineer

      5 févr. 2026
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      New York, NY
      Aucune offre
      Expérience neutre
      Entretien moyen

      Candidature

      J'ai passé un entretien chez GitHub (New York, NY)

      Entretien

      Gave OA after passing the interview screening. Recruiter will reach out it was only 1 problem in the OA on hackerrank to solve and recruiter will reach out immediately after that’s been solved

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      One leetcode recursive problem for Oa
      Répondre à cette question

      Entretien pour Software Engineer

      23 mars 2026
      Employé (anonyme)
      Offre acceptée
      Expérience positive
      Entretien facile

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé en ligne. J'ai passé un entretien chez GitHub en févr. 2025

      Entretien

      Interviewed for SWII. Was straightforward. Had a talk with a recruiter and asked basic behavior questions then told me on the call that I am being pushed to interview day. I was given what the questions might be, Interview day was 2 technical interviews and one cultural. Technical questions was to build a game of battlefield and the other was the set up some HTTP calls.

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      A game of battlefield. Set up HTTP calls
      Répondre à cette question