It was pretty long, there was a long online assessment of 4 parts. A math section, a logic section, a typical leetcode section, and a section where they give you made-up coding language syntax and have you code with it. The interview itself was also around 4 parts. The first two parts were group sessions, with software devs and the other interviewees, and they basically went over what the day to day was and the products they built. The third part was a technical interview on system design. The last part was a typical behavioral interview.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
On the technical, they asked how I would go about designing a system where a user can request an urgent care session, and be notified when to leave their house to arrive at the appointment.
J'ai passé un entretien chez Epic (San Francisco, CA)
Entretien
Medium level leetcode and then a very basic system design question as a final round interview. Overall, smooth and simple process. Only one technical and it was the first one.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
How would you design a system to minimize wait time at a health care center?
First round is a thirty minute phone call with one of their developers. The other part of the first round is a three hour exam with IQ test style logic questions and coding questions.
[OA] OA was fair. Programming part are leetcode easy and easy-mediums, straightforward simulation, backtracking, dfs, strings, etc. No DP/graphs but ymmv.
[Final interview] (Case Study) I think the interviewer came up with their own prompt. It's mostly discussion-based, with a virtual white board. It's not too technical. I'm guessing its testing your communication/logical reasoning than system design skills. (Pair programming) 1 question, same format as the OA on the same platform, leetcode easy.
[Overall] Technical difficulty isn't bad. Interviewers who are current software devs seemed friendly. Had a good experience, yet got rejected.