An opening round online quiz of 50 questions, then a quick meet with the recruiter, then a take home. The take home was a decent size full stack application - they say to take 4-8 hours but it took around 30 hours to MVP - and I felt it was really just an MVP, could have spent quite a bit more time refactoring. At first the founder emailed me saying the take home looked good and we would probably move forward, he just needed the team to look first. Then the team looked and decided it wasn't a fit. I did get some feedback in an email - but given the amount of time they're asking for this project, I think their team should consider giving feedback on the PR itself to point to specific code lines they're calling out. I guess the dev team is looking for folks who can hit the ground running - and the code they expect needs to be perfectly architected. I really didn't have time to refactor and make things perfect. I think a lot of the feedback are pretty basic things that can be understood and fixed pretty quickly on the job. Some of the feedback was actually mentioned in the "If you had more time, what would you do" section of the PR description - which makes me think the reviewers didn't read al lot the PR description which outlined . Overall you'd want to know their tech stack pretty well it seems to pass. I would urge uplift to consider spending a little bit more time reviewing these take home challenges and/or considering a smaller test to get a signal more quickly.