Initial rounds were decent. I underwent an HR screening, an online logic and personality test, and two practical Excel-based case interviews — one focused on producer outreach and another on performance metrics. Both were clear and allowed for meaningful discussion. Final round, however, was disappointing. The business case prompt was rushed and fragmented, with little structure. Ultimately, the interviewer focused heavily on buzzwords like “structured thinking,” while disregarding contextual nuances in the insurance space. The case felt more like a filtering device than an actual strategic conversation - a bootleg version of McKinsey, same vocabulary, none of the professional structure or thoughtfulness. Ironically, some strategic ideas pushed in the case were later admitted to have failed in execution, which made the whole setup feel forced and inconsistent.