The interview process at Speechify was thorough and well-structured, reflecting the company's commitment to finding the right fit for both the role and the organizational culture. It started with a recruiter screening, where the recruiter discussed my resume and experiences in a conversational manner, ensuring my qualifications aligned with the role.
Next came the coding exercise. This was challenging yet fair, focusing on practical skills and problem-solving abilities. It was a great way to showcase technical expertise relevant to the job.
The culture round followed, which was particularly insightful. Here, the focus shifted from technical skills to personal attributes and values, assessing how well I would fit into the company’s work environment and team dynamics.
The design round was the most intense, involving in-depth discussions about technical design, systems thinking, and decision-making processes. It was a clear indication of the company's emphasis on thoughtful and innovative solutions.
Finally, the offer stage was smooth and transparent. The team communicated clearly about the terms and the package, showing a great deal of professionalism.
Overall, the interview process was a blend of challenges and opportunities for meaningful engagement, reflecting the company's dedication to excellence and a positive workplace culture.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Can you tell me about a time when you took the extra mile to overcome a significant challenge at work?
J'ai passé un entretien chez Speechify (Le Caire, )
Entretien
Weird and invading my privacy, was good in general but not smooth and didn’t feel good while doing it, they should respect candidates privacy, it’s very disrespectful interview , first project was screen recorded all the time even when entering my git password
J'ai postulé en ligne. J'ai passé un entretien chez Speechify en mai 2026
Entretien
I applied for the job and received an automated email one minute later with a technical challenge using AI.
They provided a large repository for download and asked me to keep my webcam and screen recording active for 90 minutes (probably for training AI models).
They didn't provide any tools. You had to use your own tokens for the tests for 90 minutes without knowing if anyone was going to see them. Basically, that's what happened to everyone who left a review here.
I understand and like pair programming with AI, but doing it this way is impersonal, probably the worst way, and zero privacy-oriented. You never get feedback. It's one of the worst things I've seen this year.
Applied online on WTJ. Not 5 minutes after submitting your application *on a Sunday*, you receive an email that informs you that you made it ro the first round! Which is an automated cosing assessment. No human in the loop. No review of your application. They just want to give 90 minutes that you can't claim back without prior even checking that your expectations really mat h the role. "If all goes well, you'll talk with our CTO", they say. Two red flags: what is he measure of success? Why is the CTO involved at all? Looks to me like a bottlenecked process thatsjust a reflection of how they operate. Not a company I want to work with (not even for).
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Take a bkind coding assessment with your cam and mic onao that we can spy on you.