There were two rounds to the interview process
1)Technical round, which was a written test and requires good practical knowledge about trademark
2) And an HR round which was a face-to-face interview
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
If I was willing to accept an assessment internship instead since I was a complete fresher
J'ai postulé en personne. Le processus a pris 2 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez S.S. Rana & Co. (New Delhi)
Entretien
The interview process was quite exhausting and much longer than I expected. Their recruitment system is extremely strict and structured. It follows a three-stage format.
First, there’s a written HR round that screens your basic suitability. If you clear that, you move on to a second written exam, which is far more detailed and tests your subject knowledge. Only after qualifying both of these stages do you reach the final interview round.
You’ll receive a call only if you successfully clear all three levels. If you don’t make it past any one stage, they usually don’t send an update, so it’s better not to expect a revert.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
About the role, related laws. An exam was also conducted.
J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 1 semaine. J'ai passé un entretien chez S.S. Rana & Co. en avr. 2018
Entretien
There was a telephonic round with basic questions and backgournd etc . Then a perosnal interview was fixed in their office. The written was technical with subject related questions . I applied for a trademark associate position and questions asked were about Indian TM prosecution , examination reply drafting , Madrid et. After this there were some other questions on hobbies , perosnalilty etc . Thereafter the HR had a dicussion for 20 minutes . It took 2-3 hours and I was asked for refreshments and if I needed a break. The senior advocates then met me and asked certain questions about developments in the IP Laws etx and recent case laws . Overall a thorough interview.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Trademark prosecution
Changes in trademark rules 2017
Examination reply drafting