J'ai postulé via un recruteur. J'ai passé un entretien chez Revolut
Entretien moyen
Candidature
J'ai passé un entretien chez Revolut
Entretien
Technical part is 4 stages - screening q&a, live coding, more live coding and deeper q&a, system design. Each session preempted by recruiter “prep” call. All this was actually quite reasonable and realistic, no leet code. And preps were actually useful perhaps even a bit too revealing.
And then after about 6 total hours spread across several weeks they start pairing you up with multiple engineering managers who quickly get disinterested because your past experience doesn’t fit their ideal profile - contracting roles? Instant red flag. Big data but not millions of users? Too bad. Internal platform in investment bank? No, has to be retail product and not enough users anyway. Etc etc.
Like, it’s all literally right there on my CV we could have saved each other’s time from the start, why even bother reaching out? Looks like recruiter folk are gaming their KPIs (Revolut is famously driven by KPIs) that track interview stages separately.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Write a simple load balancer, implement money transfer between two accounts function, design hotel booking system.
The experience was disappointing and reflected a lack of professionalism.
The interaction gave the impression of a disorganised or potentially unhealthy work culture.
Answered most of the questions accurately and to the best of my ability.
The interview was initially scheduled for a short time slot. Toward the end, the interviewer asked for my availability and indicated that they would schedule a follow-up session to continue the discussion. However, no further communication or follow-up was received.
J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 5 jours. J'ai passé un entretien chez Revolut en mai 2026
Entretien
During the initial HR screening call, the recruiter explicitly stated that Revolut was not hiring for a specific team and that team fit would be determined only after the coding and system design stages.
However, after passing the screening, I received the following rejection message: “After carefully reviewing your experience, we've decided to move forward with candidates whose profiles more closely align with the specific requirements of the role. Please note that this decision is based on current team needs.”
This creates a clear inconsistency in the communication. If team allocation and specific requirements were to be evaluated only in later technical rounds, a rejection citing “current team needs” right after screening appears contradictory. Such practices can lead to candidates investing time in the interview process based on incomplete or misleading information at the early stage.
J'ai postulé via un recruteur. Le processus a pris 4 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Revolut en avr. 2026
Entretien
I interviewed for a Senior Software Engineer (Java) role.
The process was structured and fairly fast-paced: recruiter/screening conversation, technical discussions (coding and system design) focused on backend engineering and distributed systems, and a final manager/team-fit stage. Communication from recruiting was clear, and timelines were shared proactively. Overall, the process felt rigorous but very professional