J'ai postulé via une autre source. Le processus a pris 1 semaine. J'ai passé un entretien chez Revolut (Berlin) en sept. 2019
Entretien
HR found me in linked in and emailed me two times to have an interview. After I accepted the request they planned a HR interview which was very nice and quite normal HR talk. They mentioned there will be an homework(task) which must sent in a week. So they just send me an email with the requirements. The task was not so difficult but it was a feature and it needed to be a stand alone project which is production ready. Assigment tasks was not so clear, the API they providing a bit tricky and sending corrupted data sometimes. I found the homework time wasting it took me about 25 hours. At the end it turned out I couldn't found some of their tricks. They turn me an answer with bugs. If only I spend my time by solving puzzles. It was not an interview. This was something a little absurd
1-HR - Tell me about yourself
2-Hackerrank - 3 question 2 easy 1 medium
3-Live coding - ios development concurency etc
4- Culturel interview What is your motivation
Generally it was good.All people so friendly and they answer all my question.They response quickly.
J'ai postulé via un recruteur. Le processus a pris 3 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Revolut en sept. 2024
Entretien
Dear talents, PLEASE don't waste your time on this company.
Step 1: Call with HR
Step 2: Hackerrank tasks
Step 3: Online coding of a cache system
Step 4: System design
I've solved 3/3 tasks on hackerrank, then I successfully developed a cache system and I've answered ALL questions and covered ALL topics that were asked, and finally system design step.
As a mobile developer applying for a mobile developer role, I was quite surprised that the discussion focused almost entirely on the server-side. Having experience conducting interviews myself, I understand that perspectives on system design may vary, and I recognize that the interview is designed to showcase the candidate's experience. While I welcome a challenge and fully support assessing knowledge across different domains, this particular approach will not effectively demonstrate the true skills of a mobile developer.
Despite my best efforts to steer the conversation towards mobile-specific aspects and design considerations, the interviewer was primarily interested only in server-side implementation. Even when I emphasized my expertise in mobile development and suggested discussing the app's architecture or user experience, the conversation kept returning to server-side topics.
I got rejected without feedback despite I've successfully passed all previous stages. The feedback I received only when I asked it myself and the feedback was "Don't afraid to go out of your zone comfort". The rest of the feedback is nonsense and not true.
I shared this issue with HR and she answered that she is sorry that I had a bad experience. She had zero wish to understand the real problem.
If you are reading this text I am sure that you are a great mobile developer, so please value your time and skills, Revolut will not do it. Also, you could read the latest articles where CEO specifies his new approach "Underperformers 'get six weeks to improve or must go'"
P.S. Mobile development is not my zone of comfort, it is my specialization and the position's title ;)
J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 5 jours. J'ai passé un entretien chez Revolut (Madrid) en sept. 2024
Entretien
La experiencia mala. Entiendo que depende de quién te toque. El tipo no tenía muchas ganas, por lo que entiendo que todo eran problemas. Intentaré en otra ocasión, pero esta vez ha sido un fiasco.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Preguntas básicas de memoria y métodos asíncronos.