The interview process at Red Ventures for the SEO Analyst role was extensive and felt quite procedural, resembling a typical corporate-style interview. It spanned several weeks and involved multiple stages, which, while thorough, sometimes felt more like a tick-box exercise rather than a genuine evaluation of skills and experience. A notable aspect of the process was the involvement of a recruitment manager who, despite overseeing the interviews, appeared to have limited knowledge of SEO. This was a bit perplexing, as it seemed more like an effort to satisfy procedural requirements rather than a deep evaluation of SEO-specific skills and expertise. The questions during the interviews ranged from generic to highly specific. However, a recurring issue was the broad nature of some questions, coupled with the expectation of very specific answers. This approach was challenging, as it often felt like the interviewers expected candidates to be mind readers, familiar with the company's unique processes without prior exposure. Despite these challenges, it's important to acknowledge the positive aspects of the interview experience. The staff at Red Ventures were generally pleasant and professional. They maintained good communication throughout the process, keeping candidates well-informed about the various stages and expectations. This level of transparency and courtesy was a refreshing and appreciated aspect of the experience. In summary, while the interview process at Red Ventures was rigorous and well-structured, it sometimes lacked depth in terms of truly assessing an individual's practical SEO knowledge and experience. The focus on procedural adherence, particularly by individuals not well-versed in SEO, added a layer of complexity to the process. However, the professional demeanor of the staff and their commitment to clear communication were commendable.

First round is a call with the recruiter. Standard "here is why you should like RV" and general information on the role, department, and how the process will proceed if they like you. Second round was with the director over Bankrate, and had I been selected to move forward, the third round would have been 2 other interviews and a case study. A lot of work for what is essentially their "entry level" job. I did not make the 3rd round which is okay but I am more annoyed that when I asked for feedback as to why and ways I could improve my process, I was ghosted by the recruiter. COMPLETELY UNPROFESSIONAL.