Pros: The company appears to have an interesting business model and ambitious growth plans. The interview steps were clearly communicated at the beginning of the process. Cons: Low Engagement During Interview – The conversation lacked energy and felt like a procedural formality rather than a sincere attempt to assess mutual fit. It gave the impression that the process may have been more about ticking boxes than genuinely evaluating candidates. Poor Communication and Follow-Up – Although I was initially told to expect feedback within two days, a full week passed with no update. I had to proactively follow up to receive a response, which simply indicated that internal feedback was still pending. This delay, and the lack of initiative in keeping me informed, felt unprofessional. Sudden Shift in Decision – After finally replying that internal feedback was still being collected, I was unexpectedly rejected just one day later. The timeline and messaging were inconsistent, leaving the impression that decisions were not being clearly communicated or transparently managed. Generic Closure – The process concluded with a standard message about keeping my CV on file. Given the handling of the overall experience, this felt impersonal and unlikely to lead to future opportunities.

Entrevista teléfonica con RRHH, entrevista con el manager, dos casos practicos (algunas slides para preparar y un caso de 15min en directo por teléfono) y por fin una entrevista con la responsable del departamento