J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 1 jour. J'ai passé un entretien chez NextGenVest (San Francisco, CA) en mars 2017
Entretien
Applied online, I was emailed by William and asked to do a 4-hour challenge. I asked to do an interview instead stating that I had already done projects in a larger scale in the past and pointed him towards the repos. He checked them and said that there wasn't a live version for him to see the result. I told him that they were in fact live and pointed him towards the live URLs. He told me that I would have to do the challenge anyway. As the challenge was going to be a couple hours long I asked him if he'd be ok with paying me for my time. He told me no and that he was no longer interested.
3
Autres retours d’entretien d’embauche pour un poste comme Front End Developer chez NextGenVest
J'ai postulé via une autre source. Le processus a pris 1 semaine. J'ai passé un entretien chez NextGenVest en mars 2017
Entretien
Don't waste your time with the coding challenge. Spent personal time to complete the front end coding challenge and was rejected with a standard email. No feedback from Will.
It is a full stack app with a Node backend for a frontend coding challenge with no wireframes.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Complete this frontend coding challenge located on this github page.
J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 2 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez NextGenVest (New York, NY) en mars 2017
Entretien
I applied to NextGenVest via Angellist and Will got back to me pretty fast with a timed coding challenge. I finished and submitted it and was invited to an onsite. The onsite was okay, Will was friendly and the other team members I met were alright. He asked about some of my personal projects and then told me to whiteboard a BST search algorithm.
There was an apparent change in the interview's vibe after seeing I was struggling with the whiteboard process, Will tone became a bit more impatient and condescending.
