J'ai postulé via la recommandation d'un employé. Le processus a pris 4 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Merge API (New York, NY) en juill. 2023
Entretien
Had a pre-screen with recruiter followed by a technical screen over and 3 on-site interviews. The interview process was overall pretty good and transparent and I thought the team was nice to be around.
However, I found the portion with the last interviewer to be kind of abrasive and condescending. We basically just went through my job history on LinkedIn and was accused of having performance issues at previous roles because I didn't have a long tenure there. I was grilled for leaving a position after a couple of years for a higher role at another company.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
1. Pre screen: easy-medium coding question specific to company related to recursion and graphs. Given heads up on topic before interview which was really nice
2. On site medium-hard leetcode coding question. Given the choice of either whiteboarding or Codility
3. Systems design question (mostly thinking through DB design for a feature)
4. 30 min behavioral interview
Recruiter was nice albeit seemingly distracted. Like some entries before me I'm under the impression that the beginning stages are not undergoing any meaningful screening. When I applied, 3 things stood out to me...
1) Got an interview request within half an hour
2) The only available appointments were weeks out
3) When looking at a hiring manager's post on Linkedin, he mentioned he'd interviewed something like 48 interviews within the last 2 weeks.
How many people are going through this pipeline? In the age of AI screening I think it's nice that they are giving people a chance to talk to a human. But it also signals to me that they don't really know what they're looking for. Is this some sort of new technique to waste everyone's time?
At the very least, decisions seem to be made and communicated quickly.
I signed a non disclosure agreement so I cannot discuss any specific questions or problems. All communications were friendly. The rejection I received was generic and lacked any specific feedback.
Phone screen, technical screen, then on-site with 3 rounds (1 coding, 1 behavioral, and 1 systems design). After that, 1 more behavioral with founder. I felt like I did well on the interviews but they probably went with a candidate that had more years of experience than I did.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Typical LC type question and system design question