Aller au contenuAller au pied de page
  • Emplois
  • Entreprises
  • Salaires
  • Pour les employeurs

      Boostez votre carrière

      Découvrez votre salaire potentiel, décrochez des emplois de rêve et partagez vos témoignages de manière anonyme.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Managed by Q

      Est-ce votre entreprise ?

      À propos
      Avis
      Salaires et avantages
      Emplois
      Entretiens
      Entretiens
      Recherches associées: Avis sur Managed by Q | Offres d’emploi chez Managed by Q | Salaires chez Managed by Q | Avantages sociaux chez Managed by Q
      Entretiens chez Managed by QEntretiens d’embauche pour Software Engineer(Internship) chez Managed by QEntretien chez Managed by Q


      Glassdoor

      • À propos
      • Récompenses
      • Blog
      • Nous contacter
      • Guides

      Employeurs

      • Compte employeur gratuit
      • Centre employeur
      • Blog pour les employeurs

      Informations

      • Aide
      • Règles de la communauté
      • Conditions d'utilisation
      • Confidentialité et choix publicitaires
      • Ne pas vendre ni partager mes informations
      • Outil de consentement aux cookies

      Travailler avec nous

      • Annonceurs
      • Carrières
      Télécharger l'application

      • Parcourir par :
      • Entreprises
      • Emplois
      • Lieux

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. « Glassdoor », son logo, « Worklife Pro » et « Bowls » sont des marques déposées de Glassdoor LLC.

      Entreprises suivies

      Tenez-vous au courant des dernières opportunités et profitez de conseils d’initiés en suivant les entreprises de vos rêves.

      Recherche d’emplois

      Obtenez des recommandations et des mises à jour personnalisées en démarrant vos recherches.

      Entretien pour Software Engineer(Internship)

      17 sept. 2018
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Aucune offre

      Autres retours d’entretien d’embauche pour un poste comme Software Engineer(Internship) chez Managed by Q

      Entretien pour Software Engineer(Internship)

      6 nov. 2018
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      New York, NY
      Aucune offre
      Expérience positive
      Entretien moyen

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé via un établissement d'enseignement supérieur ou universitaire. Le processus a pris 2 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Managed by Q

      Entretien

      Met on campus, a phone call, then in person. The phone call was generic one on one with engineer. The in person was not too long, but harder than the one on one.

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      Largest sequence in 2D array
      Répondre à cette question
      Expérience négative
      Entretien moyen

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 4 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Managed by Q (New York, NY) en nov. 2018

      Entretien

      By far the worst interview process imaginable. Not sure how they managed to be so unprofessional. First was the technical phone screen, where I was called 10 minutes late, and given a pretty simple linked list problem. I did the problem well and the interviewer couldn't have sounded more uninterested. I wasn't planning on continuing the application process with them even if it went well, but after 3 days they came back to me and offered an on-site with flight and booking paid for, the usual for tech companies. At this point I agreed and gave them a second chance, because it seemed like they were putting an effort into their application process. After confirming, it took them 6 days to get back to move and let me know that instead of an on-site, it would now be a video interview. By now I was straight up offended by their process, but I agreed to the video interview because why not? I would get to at least practice with some hard problems I've never seen before ( I thought. ) In between this time I had a phone screen and on-site with a Big-N. So this process took that long. After almost 2 weeks I had the video interview. In the first phase two bootcamp software engineers asked me literally the 2nd "Hard" problem on Leetcode, so I'm not sure how much effort they put onto finding challenging problems. I can answer the question pretty well on a whiteboard, since it's a DP problem it's all about the concept of tackling it, but they asked me to code it instead and only when they saw the complexity of coding the small parts did they let me tackle it with pseudo-code like on a whiteboard. I can't tell if they actually thought that's what an on-site is supposed to be like, but I suppose I can't blame them for a lack of experience. After that was your typical behavioral interview, where two bootcamp software engineers asked me questions, wanting to hear about times I've worked with a team and was agreeable with other software engineers. I don't understand how they messed up their process that much, but their reply was actually pretty fast, I got offered a position with Big-N the same day I got rejected by these guys, for a time reference. If you go to a top-25 school, you can probably do a lot better than these guys, based on their application process and "competitive" salary, but YMMV.

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      Leetcode #10 - Regular Expression Matching
      1 réponse
      avatar
      Réponse de Managed by Q
      7y
      I’m the CTO of Managed by Q. I appreciate your feedback. I was sad to read your review. I looked into what happened and I wanted to respond. Your experience with interview scheduling wasn’t good at all. We did indeed take a long time to schedule internship interviews. We also did switch you from an on-site interview to a videoconference. Both problems were triggered by our facing a much higher volume of out of town intern candidates than our engineering team and our small recruiting team had managed before. To relieve the pressure on them I asked to start scheduling internship interviews remotely. I didn’t have a good plan in place for candidates we’d already made promises to and I ought to have ensured that we interviewed you on site as promised. We take pride in our interview process and I’m sad that we left you with a frustrating experience. It is true that the big brands have well-honed recruiting machines, with recruiting teams many times the size of our whole company. We compete with them successfully because we’ve shown that, for the right kind of person, a career at Managed by Q is even more rewarding. I hate it when our growing pains hurt our customers or our candidates. But I think it’s important for our future employees to know that the experience handling those growing pains is one of the most valuable parts of working at a small and growing company. Lastly, regarding the technical interviews, we test our questions extensively and we’ve seen many candidates solve the question you are referring to in code within the time allowed. Your interview teams were well-practiced and have spoken with dozens of candidates. That said, we recognize that there's noise in any interview and that it's possible you weren't able to show your skills. We always ask multiple technical questions to adjust for the noise. Thanks for the feedback. You’ve helped us get better for future candidates. Sorry to let you down. Congratulations on your other offer and best of luck.