J'ai postulé via un recruteur. Le processus a pris 1 semaine. J'ai passé un entretien chez IXL Learning (San Francisco, CA)
Entretien
Recruiter call and then HM call, it was an easy behavior round but felt like I messed this. The next round would have been take home assignment, panel presentation and then 4 on-site rounds
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Tell me about a data you had to work with no data Tell me about a 0 ->1 project What were some of the challenges you faced then Tell me about a difficult stakeholder you worked with Also a small 5 mins assignment where they ask you to give design opinion between 6 landing pages
A bit rushed; didn't give feedback which is always annoying; felt a bit random with how they rejected, but didn't get the logic puzzle so that could be why; format was a behavioral question, how to improve the website, logic puzzle
J'ai postulé via un recruteur. J'ai passé un entretien chez IXL Learning
Entretien
Interview was pretty standard, but they completely ghosted me after the second round. Its fine if you are rejecting me, but I find it unprofessional and a bad candidate experience to not hear back whatsoever.
J'ai postulé via la recommandation d'un employé. Le processus a pris 2 mois. J'ai passé un entretien chez IXL Learning (San Francisco, CA) en août 2025
Entretien
The process was unnecessarily long and utterly disorganized. I applied for a Product Manager role but was unexpectedly down-leveled to an Associate PM position without explanation. The recruiter took two to three weeks to respond between each step, which made the entire process drag on for over a month.
The first round was a conversational interview with PM, followed by a lengthy take-home assignment that required deep product analysis and writing. After submitting thoughtful, detailed work, I received a generic rejection email with no feedback.
For a company focused on learning and improvement, the lack of transparency, feedback, and respect for candidate time was disappointing. The process felt more like a test of endurance than a genuine evaluation of product thinking. A great mission doesn’t excuse a poor interview experience.