The interview took place in several rounds. The first round was a chat with HR, then two more technical rounds, and finally a practical task. I don't know if there are any other rounds after this one. The interviews took place over several weeks. In the first interview, although HR was very nice, I was given rather useless information about the company. I received more information about the funding (they must have told me tons of times how proud they are of it) and really little about the role. Finally, a couple of routine questions. Why do you want to change jobs? Tell me about yourself.... I later had an interview with people who were technical, or rather were supposed to be technical, but their knowledge was practically nil for the role they were looking for. This left me very surprised, since the company's main and commercial task is to create a knowledge graph for general purposes.... Finally, one assignment involved reviewing the work they were completing. From a business point of view, it doesn't seem like a very solid company. What they want to do is basically reinvent the wheel again. Or rather the Web 3.0 buzzword, adding the term "knowledge graph." DBpedia, Wikidata, Wikipedia and Yago are free huge well-supported knowledge graphs also used by FANNGs and used by millions of users. What a strange interview...