So, the technical interview was quite challenging but also really interesting. It started with a brief phone call where they asked about my background and experience, just to make sure I was a good fit for the role. After that, they sent me a coding challenge to complete within a certain time frame. It was a problem-solving task related to data structures and algorithms, which required me to write some code and optimize it for performance. I spent a good amount of time on it, making sure my solution was clean and efficient. Once I submitted the coding challenge, they scheduled a series of technical interviews. These interviews were conducted over video calls and focused on different aspects of software engineering. In one interview, I was asked to solve a coding problem on a shared code editor while explaining my thought process. It was nerve-wracking, but I managed to come up with a solution and talk through it with the interviewer. In another interview, they asked me a lot of questions about system design and architecture. They wanted to see how I would approach building a complex system from scratch, considering factors like scalability, performance, and reliability. I had to think on my feet and draw on my past experiences to come up with a solid design. There were also some behavioral questions mixed in throughout the interviews, asking about how I work in teams, handle challenges, and communicate with stakeholders. It was important to demonstrate not just technical skills, but also soft skills like teamwork and problem-solving. Overall, the technical interview process was intense but rewarding. It really tested my skills and knowledge, but it also gave me a chance to showcase what I could bring to the table as a software engineer.

I applied senior software engineer(C++) through an online job portal and was contacted to schedule an interview. Two interviewers were expected to join the session. One interviewer joined first (seems like this interviewer has very less experience) and, without asking for an introduction, immediately asked me to explain my current project, which I did. While I was responding, the second interviewer joined the call. Without understanding my ongoing explanation or my project context, the second interviewer began asking questions. I attempted to explain my current project again; however, he seemed unable to grasp it at all. This was surprising, as my project is quite straightforward and is usually understood quickly in other interviews. It involves collecting data from one domain, processing it, and exporting the processed data to another endpoint where business users can view meaningful insights through dashboards or charts. Despite not fully understanding my explanation, the second interviewer continued asking unclear and poorly framed questions. Within about 15 minutes, both interviewers abruptly ended the interview by saying they were done, strange, they did not even ask any programming or data structures or design pattern questions and ended the interview & asked if I had any questions. The overall experience felt unplanned and disorganized. Random questions without clear intent or proper context were not what I expected from a company like GE Healthcare. I was particularly surprised by the lack of structure and preparation, and one interviewer appeared to have very limited interviewing experience. Since there is no formal interview feedback portal available, I am sharing this experience here for awareness.