I recently had an interview for a position with Everty that didn't go well. From the outset, the recruiter exhibited professionalism and warmth, setting a promising tone for the interviews to come. However, as the process unfolded, it became evident that there were organizational and communication issues detracting from the overall experience. Following a promising first interview, I was invited to a second round and provided with two available time slots to choose from. Unfortunately, by the time I responded, my preferred slot had become unavailable. Nonetheless, the recruiter promptly offered an alternative time, aligning with my schedule. Regrettably, despite agreeing on a meeting time, I did not receive a formal invitation. With the scheduled time approaching, I reached out to request new slots, anticipating potential issues with the meeting. Moments before our agreed-upon time, I finally received the email invitation, leaving me scrambling to prepare and join promptly. To compound matters, one of the hiring managers experienced intermittent internet connectivity issues throughout the meeting, causing disruptions and hindering conversation flow. Despite suggestions to reschedule for a more conducive time, the hiring managers with technical problems insisted on proceeding. During the interview itself, I couldn't shake the feeling that the engagement lacked genuine interest from the hiring team. While we touched upon some aspects of the role, such as performance metrics and advertising strategies, there was a noticeable absence of inquiries about my background and expertise, particularly in email marketing, a significant component of the position. I took the initiative to broach this topic myself, only to receive a short answer in reply. Overall, my impression was that the interview failed to adequately explore my suitability for the role. The disjointed nature of the meeting, coupled with the apparent disinterest from one of the hiring managers, left me questioning the sincerity of their evaluation process.