My experience was very similar to other reviews on here. 1) The initial phone screen was directly with the hiring manager, which I thought was unusual since most initial screen calls are with recruiters 2) I was then given a take home assignment and was asked to turn around in 24 hours. Similar to others, recruiter advised that candidates usually spend no more than 6 hours on it. The questions are not difficult. The abundance of data can be overwhelming but I think they're looking for analytical people who can identify an objective function, stand up the right hypotheses and selectively analyze the data to arrive at a reasonable recommendation/conclusion. 3) After the interview, I was invited to 2 30-min each video interviews, one with the same hiring manager who screened and 1 with another in the same org. The interviews are casual and they're generally looking to assess your understanding of the business and your ability to think on your feet. In my opinion, your performance in your interview hinges on your chemistry with the interviewer. My first interviewer was warm and friendly and as a result, the interview felt much more like a informed conversation and I think like I was able to more comfortably bring out my critical thoughts. The 2nd interviewer was much more impersonal and rushed. I'm absolutely not saying this is an issue on this person's personality (the interviewer was cordial and polite) but the interview definitely felt more like a grilling session than a conversation. My impression of the team and the company would have remained generally positive until this last step, which I think was a slip on their part. After the video interviews, I did not hear back from the recruiting team for another week (no status updates, no communication on timeline). Generally for interviews, I assume I was passed for the position when I don't hear back in 2-3 days so while I wasn't hoping for positive news, it's a little discouraging and reflects badly on the recruiting team when the candidate has to reach out to hear that they were passed on. My feedback is similar to others here: 1) streamline your recruiting process so that communication with candidates are clear and on time 2) move the take home assignment later in the process (maybe after a video screen interview) - I see no reason why candidates have to sink 6 hours before having to converse with someone live for 30 minutes.

First a screening call with HR, then a take home analytical test, followed by two virtual panel interview rounds with 2-3 people each round. Some of the interviews were behavioral and some were analytical.