I was supposed to be sent a packet to study via email before going to the interview. I would have had to study the packet before going in. The lady who set up my interview never gave me this so I went in thinking it was going to be just an interpersonal interview when really it was a technical interview. They start by asking you general questions about your background and resume. They then give you a 6-page packet with a question on each one. They mostly cover database queries, inserts, and joins. They have another question with some Visual Basic code and ask you to find the logical error. They also have one pseudo code question where they ask you to insert information that was parsed from a string in another language (e.g. C++). They don’t require you to know the syntax exactly. They just want to know that you’ve worked with this stuff before and that you know how to ask questions when necessary.

Interview process was straightforward. It was a group interview with the CTO and hiring manager. They were responsive and brought me quickly to fill the role. I liked that they didn't drill you with technical questions and tests, it was more about getting to know you and a summary of your skills. I received an email the following week saying they thought I'd be a good fit for the team, and I needed to give the president a salary requirement. After receiving a short summary of the benefits from the president, I gave an approximate salary range but mentioned I was open to negotiation. I never heard back from the president, or either of the people I interviewed with after multiple follow ups. I would have liked to see some feedback, or some kind of counter offer. Very disappointed with the lack of professionalism used in this case . My advice to any future applicants would be to go in with your lowest possible salary requirement, and for the company to get that out of the way before bringing people into interview.