Aller au contenuAller au pied de page
  • Emplois
  • Entreprises
  • Salaires
  • Pour les employeurs

      Boostez votre carrière

      Découvrez votre salaire potentiel, décrochez des emplois de rêve et partagez vos témoignages de manière anonyme.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Crossover for Work

      Employeur impliqué

      À propos
      Avis
      Salaires et avantages
      Emplois
      Entretiens
      Entretiens
      Recherches associées: Avis sur Crossover for Work | Offres d’emploi chez Crossover for Work | Salaires chez Crossover for Work | Avantages sociaux chez Crossover for Work
      Entretiens chez Crossover for WorkEntretiens d’embauche pour SVP of Non-Technical Operations chez Crossover for WorkEntretien chez Crossover for Work


      Glassdoor

      • À propos
      • Récompenses
      • Blog
      • Nous contacter
      • Guides

      Employeurs

      • Compte employeur gratuit
      • Centre employeur
      • Blog pour les employeurs

      Informations

      • Aide
      • Règles de la communauté
      • Conditions d'utilisation
      • Confidentialité et choix publicitaires
      • Ne pas vendre ni partager mes informations
      • Outil de consentement aux cookies

      Travailler avec nous

      • Annonceurs
      • Carrières
      Télécharger l'application

      • Parcourir par :
      • Entreprises
      • Emplois
      • Lieux

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. « Glassdoor », son logo, « Worklife Pro » et « Bowls » sont des marques déposées de Glassdoor LLC.

      Entreprises suivies

      Tenez-vous au courant des dernières opportunités et profitez de conseils d’initiés en suivant les entreprises de vos rêves.

      Recherche d’emplois

      Obtenez des recommandations et des mises à jour personnalisées en démarrant vos recherches.

      Entretien pour SVP of Non-Technical Operations

      11 juill. 2023
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Aucune offre
      Expérience négative
      Entretien difficile

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 5 jours. J'ai passé un entretien chez Crossover for Work en juin 2023

      Entretien

      Crossover is a company that knows how to grab attention in a highly competitive job market. With posts promising extremely attractive salaries ($400,000 USD / year), the company is able to lure an astounding number of applicants from a wide range of developing countries. But careful! Do not get caught in their spamming trap. Firstly, Crossover's recruiting method is shotgun marketing. They fire their job postings across multiple platforms, in countless cities spanning over 30 countries. On top of this, they continually delete and repost these positions to maintain visibility, essentially flooding the job market. While it might seem like they're casting a wide net to capture diverse talent, the reality is that they're spammers and predators. The company targets developing economies. Crossover uses the appeal of their hefty salaries as a potent bait. This aggressive recruitment strategy seems to generate more quantity than quality, They exploit the aspirations of people in these economies. The biggest drawback lies in the staggering level of competition. So just some rough numbers: they post at 5 job sites, in 30 countries, 5 cities per country, 30 posts per month, 10 job appplicants per post. That's north of 200,000 applicants for only one vacancy. Sure, if you're a top 1% applicant, you might feel optimistic, but consider this: even among this elite group, the competition remains fierce with approximately 2,000 contenders. That leaves you with a 0.05% chance of getting the job. Crossover's strategy of offering high salaries might seem alluring at first glance, but the sheer level of competition, coupled with questionable tactics, makes the promise of landing a job more of a mirage than a genuine opportunity. Don't fall for this trap!

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      You answer a 15 min IQ test, followed by two english proficciency exams, then an extremely bad designed "Business Acumen" test. Followed by a test for lawyers that measures Critical Thinking. Finally you answer two business cases. The first one is very basic reorganization and cost cutting exercise. And the second one is writting a prompt for ChatGPT. Both cases seem extremely simple compared the pay grade, which IMO makes it suspicious... Either they don't know how to design proper business cases as McKinsey, Bain, or BCG would do.... or they are simply conducting a Big Data experiment and the position is non-existent.
      Répondre à cette question
      2