The interview process was an open interview and you could select a date. I first met as a group with HR and she went over all of our resumes. She said she was conducting the interview since the supervisor was in a meeting. At the end, I was the only one who proved to have the required skill set and, miraculously, the GC supervisor was suddenly available and could interview me (I think this was just a way of weeding out the people who were incompetent). The GC supervisor was very nice and asked a lot of specific questions related to my resume, followed by questions about the instrument itself, then trouble shooting questions when running the instrument. It’s honestly the best interviewer experience I had since I felt he was prepared to ask a lot of questions with intent (other experiences it seems like interviewers don’t care and think of questions on the fly). I waited two weeks and got a call from HR I would be meeting with the lab director. I met with the lab director who recently started. He was also a really nice guy. His questions were more about personality and finding a fit. Overall, the interview process was fine in the sense that the GC supervisor and lab director were approachable (HR was so/so). But you do really have to have an understanding of the GC, in and out. I think I demonstrated that. Based off comments from the lab manager, he seemed to like me. Overall, I think someone with more experience was hired, but I don’t believe I was a bad candidate for the role. Study up on your GC knowledge before the interview.