Very fast process. Recruiter call, first round communication with the tech lead, two tech tests a day apart. First one was a sorting issue on a shared codepad, second was a standard template architecture kind of thing. I recommend either having a whiteboard or using a tablet to quickly sketch for the architecture interview. Interviewers were more interested in stuff like file structure of a front end than "real" software architecture. There was also two other interviews with tech managers and product managers. Everyone I talked to was nice and empathetic to the stresses of actually doing these kinds of interviews, a refreshing change from most of the tech interviews I've been doing recently. None of the interviews had the "let's quiz this person on Javascript/React/CSS until they break" trivia that's popular with some certain circles. The only thing that was really disappointing was getting an HR portal template rejection letter. It would've been nice to hear some real feedback or even a "Hey, this was a tough one but we'll keep you on file." kind of thing, after doing all those rounds. Despite the rather cold rejection, I would recommend the process, and the team should keep doing what they're doing.