The interview was disorganized and nothing went according to their plan. The head staff was quite disappointed but said they wouldn't take action against mistakes occurring. It seems they're still learning the ropes of discipline to become effective leaders. From what I can come up with from the sense of the culture perhaps they had an engineer who wasn't good enough to handle the challenges. Although it was a loss for them, I did feel a sense of indignation stemming from it. As if the past engineer was not happy with management but the management had thought they were treating the engineer fairly. Competence seemed to be an issue but the standards presented were by far fair. Although I will say how it's presented could be a pitfall. The context was good but the presentation needs to be touched up to be less condescending. I declined to interview further but if they can resolve the issues they had to deal with, I'm sure the company will have a positive outcome. I do want to greatly put an emphasis that the content is there but the leadership still needs some organizing and polishing. What I mean by content is that the leadership is open to hearing your opinion to help improve the company; also they are tech-savvy.