Aller au contenuAller au pied de page
  • Emplois
  • Entreprises
  • Salaires
  • Pour les employeurs

      Boostez votre carrière

      Découvrez votre salaire potentiel, décrochez des emplois de rêve et partagez vos témoignages de manière anonyme.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Bloomberg

      Employeur impliqué

      À propos
      Avis
      Salaires et avantages
      Emplois
      Entretiens
      Entretiens
      Recherches associées: Avis sur Bloomberg | Offres d’emploi chez Bloomberg | Salaires chez Bloomberg | Avantages sociaux chez Bloomberg
      Entretiens chez BloombergEntretiens d’embauche pour Senior Software Engineer chez BloombergEntretien chez Bloomberg


      Glassdoor

      • À propos
      • Récompenses
      • Blog
      • Nous contacter
      • Guides

      Employeurs

      • Compte employeur gratuit
      • Centre employeur
      • Blog pour les employeurs

      Informations

      • Aide
      • Règles de la communauté
      • Conditions d'utilisation
      • Confidentialité et choix publicitaires
      • Ne pas vendre ni partager mes informations
      • Outil de consentement aux cookies

      Travailler avec nous

      • Annonceurs
      • Carrières
      Télécharger l'application

      • Parcourir par :
      • Entreprises
      • Emplois
      • Lieux

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. « Glassdoor », son logo, « Worklife Pro » et « Bowls » sont des marques déposées de Glassdoor LLC.

      Entreprises suivies

      Tenez-vous au courant des dernières opportunités et profitez de conseils d’initiés en suivant les entreprises de vos rêves.

      Recherche d’emplois

      Obtenez des recommandations et des mises à jour personnalisées en démarrant vos recherches.

      Entretien pour Senior Software Engineer

      2 oct. 2018
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Aucune offre
      Expérience neutre
      Entretien facile

      Candidature

      Le processus a pris 3 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Bloomberg en sept. 2018

      Entretien

      I applied through a recruiter, they scheduled a telephonic interview in a week. The interview has three parts, about the resume (10-12 min), coding (45 min) and any questions about the company (5 min). The coding part is not hard. However, they are still in old C++ style and the interviewer did not understand C++ 11 syntax (like the new for loop, auto, shared_ptr etc) and when I asked him if I should write using old C++ he asked me not to. However, it is a little frustrating to hear that they are not taking advantage of the new language feature. During the interview, he gave me an impression that he was very happy with my coding and told me that he is happy with my performance. We had a nice discussion as we develop the program. I completed both questions up to his satisfaction, but after a week I got the response from my recruiter that even though they thought that I am a strong candidate, my skill set doesn’t match with the requirement. It was a surprise to me as I am working on the same field using C++ for 19 years, but still, my skill set does not match with their requirement. Maybe he was not happy when I started using new C++ language features.

      Questions d'entretien [3]

      Question 1

      Compress a string using a number of the repeated character followed by the actual character. For example, aaassbd should be converted tp 3a2s1b1d.
      Répondre à cette question

      Question 2

      Matrix multiplication (3X3 to 1X3). I forgot the actual logic, but I quickly picked up the logic and wrote the program once he explained the basic logic with a simple example.
      Répondre à cette question

      Question 3

      Time and space complexity of the above functions.
      Répondre à cette question
      1

      Autres retours d’entretien d’embauche pour un poste comme Senior Software Engineer chez Bloomberg

      Entretien pour Senior Software Engineer

      6 mai 2026
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Aucune offre
      Expérience négative
      Entretien difficile

      Candidature

      J'ai passé un entretien chez Bloomberg

      Entretien

      Terrible communication. Got passed between 3 different recruiters all of whom gave specific dates for updates and blew past them. Descriptions of what would be covered in the interviews are wholly inaccurate (don’t bother reading the PDF they sent to “prep” you, almost none of it came up in any of the 3 interviews I did with them.) Interviewers themselves were decent but clearly had exact “right” answers they were looking for. What’s the point of a leetcode question where there’s only one way to implement it? What’s the point of a system design interview where you’re having a candidate parse through a complex system that they clearly already know everything about and are just looking for 1-2 EXACT modifications to check off their boxes? Was there even a right answer? I genuinely don’t know what this company was looking for. Waste of time, waste of effort, waste of resources. Avoid, avoid, avoid

      Entretien pour Sr. Software Engineer

      21 avr. 2026
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      New York, NY
      Aucune offre
      Expérience positive
      Entretien moyen

      Candidature

      J'ai passé un entretien chez Bloomberg (New York, NY)

      Entretien

      Interviewed with two separate teams. Coding rounds. Leet code style question. The interview went on for 1 hr. Waiting for the next steps. The seem to like link lists and arrays

      Entretien pour Senior Software Engineer

      14 mai 2026
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Aucune offre
      Expérience négative
      Entretien difficile

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé via une autre source. J'ai passé un entretien chez Bloomberg en avr. 2026

      Entretien

      Drawn out / repetitive / redundant, overly focused on algorithms you won't use, matches candidates with teams that don't need them. I started interviewing with 2 teams per their process, passed one and failed the other. The team I passed with then filled their role, so they had me interview with a 3rd team but had me start over from first round. I pass this AGAIN (so, to be clear, I've passed 2 out of 3 first rounds with 3 different teams), and then they have me do 2 second round interviews. I made clear I had a lot of client-side experience with a high degree of skill in interface engineering and client architecture. The system design interview asked me basically to "build whatsapp," which is a backend distributed architecture problem. They weren't checking that I knew how a REST api works - they wanted to know about database redundancy with sharding and partitioning and so on, interservice data format pros and cons, message broker queue latency, scaling all these backend things....like, it was not basic stuff. They clearly wanted a distributed systems expert, and of course declined to move forward with my candidacy. With this being the final result of 5 interviews, I expressed that I felt I was matched with the wrong team and received no reply. Kind of feel like my time was wasted. Also, a portion of people I spoke with had no personality or warmth whatsoever.

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      Build whatsapp from a system design perspective.
      Répondre à cette question
      1