3,0
12 mars 2026
Employé (actuel), plus d'un an
Pune
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale
Avantages
WFH is available to some people
Inconvénients
Pay scale, health benefits, no-bonus
Avantages
WFH is available to some people
Inconvénients
Pay scale, health benefits, no-bonus
Avantages
All positive reviews are fake please ignore it
Inconvénients
Sorry ,I can't give 0 rating , if you want to make your life hell then only join this company. Once you join you cannot make mistake. They expect zero QA bug if single bug raised ready with explanation. Managers conduct standup call just to humiliate, insult employees, there are some senior people (so called chatu log) only get respect. If you are not in good of managers your life will become hell. Extreme level micro management. 0 work life balance people works there till 2 Am in the morning, for production release you need to join after dinner. Lot of politics leads constantly judge you. Give your bad review everytime. Only people praise those are ready to give 24 hours to company. Managers even call you on Saturday Sunday to change your story status. Managers thought the company is thier ancestors property. HR policies are not present. They can give you start of month award for this month and next month they can force you to resign due to poor performance. Senior will not mix up with anyone they have their own group even frontend lead not mix with his own team and they will not allow you to join their group . If you join you have to lunch yourself have tea yourself no one will join you
Avantages
Good exposure to projects. Opportunity to work with modern technologies and solve real-world challenges. Talented developers and supportive teammates who are always willing to help. A good place to build technical skills early in your career.
Inconvénients
The biggest challenge during my tenure was the leadership culture within the Telecom project. The delivery head, in my experience, lacked the technical understanding and people-management skills required to lead a software engineering team effectively. Decisions were often made without fully understanding the technical challenges, making it difficult for the team to execute efficiently. Daily stand-up meetings frequently focused on attendance, joining a few minutes late, or keeping cameras on, while delivery challenges, technical blockers, and team well-being received less attention. Feedback was often given publicly instead of constructively, which created unnecessary stress and lowered team morale. Many employees felt unsupported during client discussions. Rather than working with the team to find solutions, leadership often placed responsibility on the team without fully understanding the situation. This affected trust and confidence within the team. During my time there, I saw several experienced employees leave the project or the company. Based on conversations with colleagues, the leadership style and work environment were recurring concerns. While every resignation has different reasons, the workplace culture appeared to be an important factor for many people. The project had talented engineers and good technical potential, but the leadership approach prevented the team from performing at its best.