Avantages
None. I don't think there was a single thing. Even for a company which was meant to be based on employee recognition and engagement
Inconvénients
I wouldn't recommend this company to any software engineer who values good leadership, modern tech practices, or even basic development hygiene. The CEO had zero understanding of what it takes to scale software properly—his definition of scaling was just “get more customers,” regardless of whether the platform could handle it. The product was a complete mess: no multi-tenancy, no separation of concerns, and a single codebase with hardcoded, customer-specific logic scattered throughout. Each deployment felt like a hackathon of manual interventions, fragile configurations, and duct-taped patches just to keep things from crashing. The worst part? The CEO clearly viewed the dev team as expendable. Most of the team turned over every year, with only one poor soul left holding any meaningful knowledge of the system. It was a revolving door of developers, because nobody could (or should) put up with such an environment. Rather than fix the root causes, the CEO tried to slap AI on top of the chaos, as if that would magically solve the underlying technical debt. Outdated tech, no documentation, poor architecture, zero support from leadership, and unrealistic expectations. If you're a developer looking to grow or even just maintain your sanity, stay far, far away.