employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

International Rescue Committee

Est-ce votre entreprise ?

Has potential to be great - Avis employé Resettlement Case Manager International Rescue Committee

1,0
11 mars 2024
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Great team and great mission, but unfortunately zero support and not enough funding and no work-life balance

Inconvénients

Not allowed to pay overtime, takes advantage of immigrants and asks for us to work 50+ hours a week. caseworkers do ALL of the field work and management does not help at all with any field work (which is 85% of the job). We are asked to only log 37.5 hours a week, regardless of how many we work and we are denied overtime. The "little" people simply do not matter at this organization yet they are the people working with refugees. So frustrating and skewed my entire perception of larger non-profits.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur International Rescue Committee

5,0
15 juin 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Flexible work schedule Great cause Dedicated staff

Inconvénients

None that I can think of

2,0
22 avr. 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Inconvénients

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

4
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout