Good culture and peers, management is weird, comp is average - Avis employé Software Engineer Infor

5,0
24 juill. 2025
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Excellent culture Peers are trustworthy and competent Job is never boring

Inconvénients

Compensation is just average Management tracks attendance meticulously Average Benefits

avatar
Réponse de Infor
10mo
We strive to make Infor a great place to work for everyone, and to create an environment where employees can grow and thrive. We're happy to hear that your experience at Infor is a good one! Contribution-motivated employees are critical to Infor's long-term success. At Infor, we structure compensation to align with an employee's interests to continuously motivate them to maximize their contributions that will be most beneficial to the employee and our principle-based framework. We encourage you to work with your supervisor or HR team to discuss compensation.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Infor

5,0
31 août 2025
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Good culture and work environment

Inconvénients

Low average salary compared to abroad offices

3,0
22 mai 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Inconvénients

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Réponse de Infor
1mo
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout