Good Company - Avis employé Senior Software Engineer Infor

4,0
23 oct. 2015
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

1. Good Culture 2. Work from home option is present if you work hard & prove you are skill professional. 3. Good IT policy(No blocking of websites) & IT hardware laptops are great. 4. Good Insurance. 5. Great place for Events/Sports activities. 6. Not hire & fire company.

Inconvénients

1. Forget work from home option if you are reporting in USA manager. Here you need to take permission with HR head & some times you feel like you are LKG kid & need to take permission from teacher. 2. Salaries are little less when compared to market. 3. We have around 20 directors here, All the Good benefit policies are applicable to them only. If they become senior director, then some policies will be not applicable for coming director.. 4. If you are going to onsite with Infor account then be ready with PerDM salary. 5. People worked more than 5 years may get bored as technology improves are less...

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Infor

5,0
23 août 2025
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Work is challenging and exciting

Inconvénients

May have to work on christmas

3,0
22 mai 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Inconvénients

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Réponse de Infor
3w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout