Generic and Repetitious Company - Avis employé Treasury Infor

1,0
11 janv. 2024
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Good if you don’t like interacting with people and just want to collect a check

Inconvénients

There is too much work given and no one complains because most people here are workaholics. Managers and Co-workers work in an Avoidant Leadership style and are severely lacking in communication and people skills. Work is extremely manual, and management is always looking to put more work on you. Managers and Co-workers often work long hours so there is no work life balance. PTO is unlimited but it is at the discretion of your manager who can limit you. There is no career progression and many people there have been sitting in the same position for 10+ years. It is unfortunate for those that have stayed at Infor for so long don’t know how great other companies operate.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Infor

5,0
5 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Great company to work for. Flexible. Great mentors and access to leadership.

Inconvénients

Leadership changes frequently Infor has a few "focus" industries - its best to be in one of those lines of business if you want to maximize sales compensation.

avatar
Réponse de Infor
1mo
Thank you for your review. We’re delighted to hear about your positive experience with us.​ ​ We are the forefront of industry trends and emerging technologies, ensuring our people constantly have new opportunities to learn, grow, and accelerate their careers. ​
3,0
22 mai 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Inconvénients

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Réponse de Infor
3w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout