Great company struggling to become an Industry leader - Avis employé Senior Business Analyst Infor

3,0
2 oct. 2010
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Infor offers it's employees the opportunity to work on complex business problems. Excellent exposure to technology and domain knowledge. It's got large global footprint so there is diversity in culture. Good work environment and culture. Middle management is flexible and care about their people. Time off request is not frowned on, so that's a good. You can have a balance work family life.

Inconvénients

- Compensation is sub par. Pay raise are rare and often less that 2%, so negotiate your starting salary well. - No 401k matching. - Communication needs to be improved across the organization - Not built here mentality that leads to redundancy - Change is constant, and so corporate strategy - Becoming to Microsoft centric. It' might comeback to bite - Since Infor grows through acquisitions, it seems each location seems to retain it's culture prior to it being acquired. - Very little support personnel growth your expected to learn on your own.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Infor

5,0
27 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Good pay for area compared to other companies

Inconvénients

Some coworkers were low quality / low tier talent

avatar
Réponse de Infor
1w
Thank you for leaving a review. We strive to make Infor a great place to work for everyone, and to create an environment where employees can grow and thrive. We're happy to hear that your experience at Infor is a good one!
3,0
22 mai 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Inconvénients

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Réponse de Infor
1w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout