Looking for some great people - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) Elanco

5,0
21 mars 2018
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Come and join a company with a bright future. Culture, people, working environment, competitive spirit is what drives the engine.

Inconvénients

Some people are nervous about the outlook on the company. Those that are thrill seekers will be rewarded.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Elanco

5,0
14 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Management listens to their emoloyees. Great benefits.

Inconvénients

Old equipment. Lots of forced ot for hourly employees

avatar
Réponse de Elanco
1w
We appreciate your positive feedback regarding management and benefits. At Elanco, we are dedicated to the wellbeing of our employees and are always looking for opportunities for improvement - we thank you for your feedback!
2,0
20 févr. 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.

Inconvénients

Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue. Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees. Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.

1
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout