Make sure you are call center minded and don't mind micromanagement - Avis employé Personal Lines Underwriter Selective Insurance

2,0
14 oct. 2008
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Good benefits. Tuition reimbursement. Designation tests are paid for and bonus given upon completion. The building is secure and clean.

Inconvénients

Incompetent management. Call center environment. Small salary increases. Extremely under paid compared to similar positions with other companies in the same geographical location. Micro management. Plummeting stock prices. Only one HR person and there is not an open door policy. Any complaints made by you against anyone will be shared with that person and your name will be disclosed. Training is inadequate. There are no opportunities to move up unless you are willing to move to Branchville NJ. Lateral move is available,

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Selective Insurance

5,0
17 avr. 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Inconvénients

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1,0
26 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Inconvénients

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout