It was a good place to work in terms of learning new things, but slow to change and managing people like it's 1985. - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) Selective Insurance

3,0
18 juin 2014
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

You were given real assignments and exposure to management. You felt like your job was pretty safe and no one was nipping at your heals to take it away from you. They were willing to pay for some of my graduate school work which i was grateful for. Health Benefits/401K were definitely top of the line.

Inconvénients

Salary was not even at market average, there was not much regard to the work/life balance. Was never given the opportunity to work from home, didn't even have a laptop which in 2013 is pretty unheard of.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Selective Insurance

5,0
17 avr. 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Inconvénients

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1,0
26 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Inconvénients

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout