Age discrimination abounds - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) Selective Insurance

1,0
19 août 2020
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Nice cafeteria for employees in building

Inconvénients

If you think you can work your way into management by putting in long hours and being a good employee, think again. Young lazy twenty-somethings are promoted before long term hard workers. Management rewards gossip. Mid management was racist, misogynistic homophobe and made no secret of it. This is a toxic environment for those who want to be rewarded for being diligent. Low pay. Salaried employees forced to work weekends at times simply because they are salaried. Sickening management cliques exist. This is not a good company to work for.

avatar
Réponse de Selective Insurance
5y
Thank you for your candid response. We encourage you to contact your former HR Manager to help us better understand your experience and evaluate any necessary actions.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Selective Insurance

5,0
17 avr. 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Inconvénients

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1,0
26 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Inconvénients

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout