employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

International Rescue Committee

Est-ce votre entreprise ?

examen de l'organisation - Avis employé Finance Manager International Rescue Committee

5,0
16 avr. 2021
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

IRC, est une organisation humanitaire dynamique qui possède un système et une structure organisationnels merveilleux et qui travaille dans le monde entier pour aider les peuples dont la vie et les moyens de subsistance sont brisés par les conflits et les catastrophes, y compris la crise climatique, à survivre, à se remettre et à prendre le contrôle de leur avenir. Je suis donc très heureux d'apporter ma contribution aux peuples qui ont besoin d'aide grâce à une organisation similaire.

Inconvénients

Comme cette organisation travaille dans différentes régions, y compris les régions éloignées et les régions qui ont beaucoup de difficultés, il peut être difficile de vivre en famille en s'installant dans une région spécifique.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur International Rescue Committee

5,0
15 juin 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Flexible work schedule Great cause Dedicated staff

Inconvénients

None that I can think of

2,0
22 avr. 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Inconvénients

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

4
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout