Only cares about upper management - Avis employé Reviewer Inovalon

1,0
12 mai 2017
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Ability to work from home.

Inconvénients

Upper management makes decisions to make them money with no thought of the workers who make them all their money. Despite all the layoffs and stress to meet absurd productively goals ( who can review charts at 4 per hour when they have thousands of pages). Suggestions to decrease chart size that will greatly increase productively go on deaf ears. Dr Duleavy used to care about people. He knows the review process but he lets new upper management determine what gets cut. Charts are so huge, scrambled and contain mixed members. Instead of fixing this at the source to cut review time, they feel saving money on gathering the record by electronic transfer is cost effective. Unfortunately, review time is increasing. Wouldn't it be more cost effective to get rid of unnecessary documents, shorten the charts thereby increasing productively. I hope Dr Duleavy reads this. Inovalon is top heavy and getting rid of worker bees will ultimately cause the company to collapse.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Inovalon

5,0
4 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Good team and good company to work with

Inconvénients

Benefits can be better and teams can coordinate better

1,0
9 juin 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

The company was a great place to work under the leadership of its founder and CEO. It offered strong products, a positive culture, and exceptional sales leadership. However, after the founder and president departed, the company’s direction and leadership changed significantly, impacting the overall employee experience.

Inconvénients

Since the leadership transition, the focus appears to have shifted away from employees and more toward financial performance and investor perception. The company has gone through multiple rounds of layoffs, while at the same time hiring sales representatives who often seemed underprepared for the role. Much of the enablement function was reduced or eliminated, with an increasing reliance on AI-driven solutions. Leadership within my department was challenging (toxic). There was a noticeable tendency to favor individuals brought in from a previous company, which negatively impacted morale and team dynamics - leadership was clueless . The leadership style often came across as inflexible, with limited openness to alternative perspectives or collaboration. It was a “I know best because I’m so experienced so it should be THIS way” mentality . As a result, cross-functional relationships suffered (sales leaders didn’t respect dept leadership) and there was little partnership with sales leadership to reinforce training and enablement initiatives. One bright spot was the Sales Engineering organization. The team was highly skilled, well-respected, and led by an exceptional leader who fostered a strong culture and delivered real value to the business. Overall, while the company offers solid products and has talented people in certain areas, the culture, leadership decisions, and ongoing organizational instability make it difficult for me to recommend as a long-term career destination.

Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout