Tough But Very Good - Avis employé Senior Product Manager Infor

5,0
18 juin 2015
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Product driven strategy from excellent executive team. Open access across the company, you can get to whoever you need directly without wasting a lot of time in channels. Rapid change means you can make an impact if you stay on top of things.

Inconvénients

Open access across the organization also means a degree of disorder. Rapid rate of change unsettles some people and does cause some stress. But things are settling down somewhat.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Infor

5,0
17 déc. 2025
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

- Good people - Good benefits -

Inconvénients

- OffShore heavily. Good portion of company is based outside of the US

3,0
22 mai 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Inconvénients

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Réponse de Infor
1mo
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout