Classic corporate job with some perks and more downsides - Avis employé Software Engineer Infor

3,0
12 nov. 2019
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Flexible time, HO, anything that can be approved by direct management is negotiable and doable, some interesting new projects, if you stick long enough, you can get among the dark horses of the company, which take whats left of the small budget/new title every few years.

Inconvénients

Huge fluctuation of people - more are leaving, even from higher management. Outsourced colleagues can barely speak English and their skill is below junior level, no budget to anything - education, raises, not even computer upgrades. Possibly connected to IPO. No communication from higher management whatsoever.

avatar
Réponse de Infor
6y
We understand the uncertainty that comes with organizational realignments, and as a global company, Infor recognizes the importance of maintaining a cohesive culture and open channel of communication. As we continue to move forward, Infor leaders will be providing regular updates through All Hands calls and local communications to our employees. Making progress is a journey, so we appreciate your candid feedback.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Infor

5,0
31 août 2025
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Good culture and work environment

Inconvénients

Low average salary compared to abroad offices

3,0
22 mai 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Inconvénients

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Réponse de Infor
1mo
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout