Questions posées lors d’un entretien d’embauche pour Community HealthCorps chez AmeriCorps
Mis à jour le 16 déc. 2015
- Populaires
- Plus récents
- Plus anciens
- Plus faciles
- Plus difficiles
Entretiens chez AmeriCorps
Expérience d'entretien
Comment d’autres ont décroché un entretien
Entretiens pour les meilleurs postes chez AmeriCorps
- Corps Member (17)
- Team Leader (13)
- Volunteer (8)
- Volunteer Coordinator (8)
- Tutor (5)
- Community Engagement Coordinator (5)
- Literacy Tutor (5)
- Site Supervisor (4)
- Mentor (4)
- Member (4)
- Service Member (4)
- NCCC Corps Member (4)
- Intern (3)
- Health Educator (3)
- Program Assistant (3)
- Program Coordinator, Non-Profit (3)
- Outreach Coordinator (2)
- Internship (2)
- Teacher (2)
- Summer Associate (2)
- Coordinator (2)
- Academic Tutor (2)
- Jumpstart Tutor (2)
- Student Mentor (2)
- Community HealthCorps (2)
- Reading Corps (2)
- Ohio Reading Corps Tutor (2)
- Service Scholar (2)
- Community Relations Coordinator (1)
- Construction Laborer (1)
Employé anonyme, Los Angeles, CA
J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 2 mois. J'ai passé un entretien chez AmeriCorps (Los Angeles, CA)
The whole process was very slow, it took about two months. Started with a phone interview then interview with program coordinator and site coordinator. Be ready to answer why you are passionate about the community and why you want to serve. If your heart is in it you will do great they will see what you are passionate about serving.
Employé anonyme
J'ai passé un entretien chez AmeriCorps
very extensive, multi-leveled approach, allowed for ranking in preferences from both host site and applicant. rewarding - interview process was very personal. First, was a phone screening process, interview asked general work environment questions (weaknesses, strengths, challenges, etc). Then came the in-person interviews. Applicants' resumes were submitted to multiple host sites, and site supervisors were able to select their most interested applicants. Ultimately, upon completion of interviews, both supervisors and applicants were asked to rank their interviews in order of interest and the program coordinator would assign based on outcomes.